Vote- it makes a difference

Military Deaths you don’t hear about 

This was sent to me by a fellow veteran with whom I served in Berlin. Most telling is the second part – how deaths of servicemen have been suppressed since Obama.- Tom Vail []

Our President, the Golfer in Chief, has made the Rules of Engagement so difficult that our troops are often killed before they can even get permission to fight. Nothing has been done to stop our troops from being murdered by the Afghanis they are training, either. Now, the President wants the US to sign on to the UN”s International Criminal Court (ICC), which would allow the UN’s ICC to arrest and try US troops for War Crimes, without the legal protections guaranteed under US Law, and from which there is no appeal.

This President, with Democratic control of the Senate, has nearly all the power. If the Non-Establishment Republicans, and Conservatives, can take back the Senate in 2014, our troops can once again be protected from unnecessary danger. Please consider this, and send it on to your mailing lists.


Interestingly enough, when GWB was president you heard about military deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan almost daily. Since Obama has been in the White House, the mainstream media has beenstrangely quiet. More than 1,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in the last 27 months. This is more than the combined total of the nine years before. Thirty have died in August. During the last month, over 50 additional NATO and US servicemen have been murdered, inside jobs by those who are hired to be a force for good in Afghanistan.

This commander in chief is AWOL. Not a peep, although he ordered the White House flag flown at half-staff for the Sikhs that were killed. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military against the indifferent incompetence of this president. It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 4 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed,campaigned, fund raised, and generally ignored the plight of our men and women in uniform. But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the vote drive against this president.

Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired, and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November election if they all respond.

The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they all show up at the polls. It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turn out to vote by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

A movement has been started by many who serve in our armed forces to get out the vote in 2014. They are organizing themselves, but this can be done by all of us.   The 2014 United States elections will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2014.

During this midterm election year, all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives, and 33 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate will be contested in this election. 



Blog: UN attempted end run around US Constitution

See on Scoop.itEconomicFactors

In mid-2012, the World Congress on Justice, Governance and Law for Environmental Sustainability (WCJGLES) was held in Brazil. The goal of the congress was to

“contribute to the support of Chief Justices, Attorneys General, Auditors Generals and other legal experts to the achievement of sustainable development and to provide inputs to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio +20.” continued…

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Bill McKee‘s insight:

Authoritarian regimes- members of the farcical United Nations-  are intent upon imposing their authoritarian views on America.  Here is a recent example of that effort.  The last thing Globalists want is for America to remain free from their clutches and want desparately to bring America down so that they can plunder at will.

See on

Public Officials Must Learn About Agenda 21

Elected officials must learn what Agenda 21 is before opening their
mouths and revealing their ignorance. Henry Lamb explains why.

Public Officials Must Learn About Agenda 21

      Henry Lamb

California Representative Wally Herger offered an article on Agenda 21
which, unfortunately, reflects  a lack of knowledge about Agenda 21 –
shared by far too many elected officials.   In the first instance, he
said that Agenda 21 is a document developed at a U.N. Conference in


Agenda 21 was developed over a period of time, traceable from the
1972 U.N. Conference on the Environment, which identified “environmental
protection” as the world’s greatest problem, and gave the world the
U.N. Environmental Programme,  followed almost immediately by Nixon’s
Executive Order that created the EPA.

Then came the 1976 U.N. Conference on Human Settlements, signed by the U.S., which proclaimed that “Public control of land use is…indispensible.” 
The next major step was the creation of the U.N. World Commission on
Environment and Development in 1983, chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. 
The commission issued its final report in 1987, called Our Common Future
This document produced the concept and defined the term “Sustainable
Development” to be:  “Development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own

This rather ambiguous definition was spelled out in great detail in a
40-chapter, 300-page document titled Agenda 21, signed and adopted by
179 nations in 1992 (not 1993) at the U.N. Conference on Environment and
Development in Rio de Janeiro.

Herger goes on to say:

“While this document was agreed to by the United Nations, the United
States is a party to the agreement only by our membership in the U.N.
For the agreement to become legally binding, it would require submission
to the U.S. Senate for ratification by the President. This has not
occurred. Again, ‘Agenda 21’ is not legally binding on the United


Actually, the document was adopted by 179 nations, including the
signature of George H.W. Bush.  A nation’s signature on a U.N. document
obligates the nation to do nothing in opposition to the goals of the
document, and to promote implementation of the document’s
recommendations.  Agenda 21 is not a treaty subject to Senate
ratification.  It was never intended to be a treaty.   (Bill Clinton
signed the Kyoto Protocol.  Because his signature obligated the U.S.,
George W. Bush took the unusual action to have the U.S. signature
removed from the document.) At the same conference, however, two
treaties were adopted by the U.N.: The framework Convention on Climate
Change, signed by Bush and ratified by the Senate; and the Convention on
Biological Diversity, not signed by Bush,  signed by Clinton, but not ratified by the Senate.

Nothing in Agenda 21 is legally binding on any government until a
government – at any level – adopts an Agenda 21 recommendation as a law
or ordinance, or as an Executive Order such as EO 12852 issued by
President Bill Clinton in 1993 in response to Agenda 21 recommendation

“Governments, in cooperation, where appropriate, with international
organizations, should adopt a national strategy for sustainable

Bill Clinton’s EO created the “President’s Council on Sustainable
Development” expressly for the purpose of implementing the
recommendations in Agenda 21 throughout federal, state, and local
governments.  The EPA and other federal agencies offered challenge
grants to state and local government to promote the implementation of
the recommendations in Agenda 21.  The federal government gave more than
$5 million to the American Planning Association to produce “Growing Smart: Legislative Guidebook,”
which provides model legislation for states that, when adopted,
requires counties and cities to adopt recommendations found in Agenda

Herger says further: “There are innumerable reasons to be concerned
about the United Nations, but I don’t believe the toothless “Agenda 21″
is one of them.”

Sadly, Herger’s lack of knowledge about Agenda 21 is shared by most
elected officials.  The recommendations in Agenda 21 are presented as
Smart Growth, Sustainable Communities, Greenways, and a host of similar
buzz words.    Agenda 21 is toothless until a local government
incorporates Agenda 21 recommendations into their comprehensive land use
plans.  Then the recommendations have the force of law.

A U.N. accredited non-government organization called ICLEI
(International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) exists at
the behest of the U.N.
for the purpose of helping local governments implement the
recommendations in Agenda 21.  ICLEI has contracts with more than 600
U.S. cities and counties and is working diligently to spread its gospel
even further.

Rep Herger, and all elected officials, should learn more about Agenda
21 and its effect on communities where it has been implemented.  People
in Los Angeles County are being removed
(17:35) from their own private property for non-compliance with Agenda
21 recommendations included in recently adopted building codes. People
are being forced to live where they do not want to live because of Urban
Boundary Zones, and arbitrary and, unreasonable acreage requirements
for a single dwelling.  The free videos available here
are a great place for elected officials, and everyone else, to begin
their education on Agenda 21 and sustainable development.  This same
site offers a wealth of detailed, well-documented information on Agenda
21, its source, history, and effect.

Elected officials must learn what Agenda 21 is before opening their mouths and revealing their ignorance.


Originally published at The Moral Liberal by Contributing Editor, Henry Lamb, who is also the author of “The Rise of Global Governance,”  Chairman of Sovereignty International, and founder of the  Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO) and Freedom21, Inc.

Did you like this article? Be sure to share it with your friends, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, and subscribe to our RSS feed to stay up to date on problems with Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development.
Articles In This Category
Related Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read Articles
Category Articles
Related Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read Articles
Next >

It’s hard to believe… but many public officials STILL don’t have a clue concerning the United Nations Agenda 21 and the stated intentions and goals. Clueless is the word that comes to mind. This article explains once again the source of tremendous efforts to use “the environment” as cover for a far more sinister effort to bring America to it’s knees via regulation, taxation, and destruction of it’s sovereign status.

The United (Socialist) Nations – Progress on Global Governance via Climate Change, Sustainable Development and Bio-Diversity | Originals


Who is behind the effort to use fraudulent “Climate Science” as a tool for political consolidation and manipulation? To be direct.. Socialists.

Examine the facts for yourself. Consider the political aspirations of those who continue to push the hoax, despite clear and compelling evidence that this man made global climate change is nothing more than a giant hoax, the aim being to use it as cover for an effort to bring the world into a “one world” government with unelected “leaders” to become imperial taskmasters. Read the evidence. Test it against the best arguments brought forth by the United Nation’s “Globalist” cabal. The one common theme is the sincere and consistent use of junk science and outright deception..even in the face of overwhelming evidence. This effort to control via a massive centralized government has nothing to do with “climate science”, and everything to do with domination and and subjugation of sovereign states to the will and power of people who lust to prey on the inhabitants of the world.. especially those who wish to live free.

UN Bureaucrats Receive Pay Hike

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon believes that there is a global environmental crisis that requires looting the Western economies to the tune of trillions of dollars in coming years. But such financial plundering apparently will not be standing in the way of a quite substantial pay increase for United Nations employees.

At a time when the West is reeling from a global recession, and individuals, corporations, and even profligate governments are realizing that a measure of financial reality is no longer optional, the recent UN diktat that $76 trillion would be needed over the next two generations to be redistributed as Third World environmental welfare sounded like a bad joke. Now, the decision to enact a significant pay raise for UN bureaucrats is further proof of Ban’s poor sense of comedic timing.

Only months ago, the secretary general was saying that the UN was facing an “emergency situation” and demanding budgetary cuts. Now, members of the UN staff in New York have received a 2.2 percent increase in their pay. As reported at

Among other things, the new income hike means that the highest ranked officials at the U.N. headquarters — including members of the audience Ban harangued last March — will get a take-home, tax-free pay package of about $240,000.

The same officials last year would have earned about $235,240. That is about one-fifth higher than the gross pay of the highest level officials of the U.S. government, including federal Cabinet members, who earn a maximum of $199,700 — before deductions and taxes. But the U.S. officials still pay taxes, which reduces their pay, on federal taxes alone, by about another 21 percent.

The difference is even bigger for the next highest tier of U.N. officials, who take home about $220,000 a year, tax-free, after the new COLA hike, known in U.N.-speak as a “post adjustment.” That’s up from about $215,760 last year. Compared to the $179,700 earned by U.S. officials at the equivalent federal pay grade, the difference is about 22 percent — before the U.S. officials start paying taxes, which they must do, like all U.S. citizens.

In fact, the top brass of the U.S. government are likely to fall even further behind U.N. pay scales in the future.

The bloated, overpaid federal bureaucracy has finally found an institution that can rival and outstrip its incapacity for restraint. The tax exempt character of UN wages only makes the situation worse, of course, removing the luxurious salaries from the tax base of the nations of which such international bureaucrats are ostensibly citizens.

With an institutional history of failure to keep the peace, even as it pursues a series of agendas that are fundamentally in conflict with American national sovereignty and the rule of constitutional law, the notion that UN bureaucrats will grow even more wealthy off the funds extracted from the United States and other nations is obscene. As the Department of Labor reports that weekly claims for unemployment insurance have soared to 417,000 — the 20th week in a row when first-time claims have exceeded 400,000. As unemployment remains a crisis in the United States, and the federal and state governments watch their budgets teeter on the brink of collapse, and economic growth remains stagnant, at least the populace may rest easy knowing the denizens of the United Nations monolith have been surfeited at the taxpayers’ expense. And those same overpaid globalists will continue to dream of the ways in which they will better order the economies of the world by stripping what wealth remains within the West and scattering it over the rest of the globe.


Comments (1)add comment

Write comment
You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.


Pompous organization thrives on enslaving people the world over, all the time pontificating all manner of self righteous nonsense.