Vote- it makes a difference

Military Deaths you don’t hear about 

This was sent to me by a fellow veteran with whom I served in Berlin. Most telling is the second part – how deaths of servicemen have been suppressed since Obama.- Tom Vail []

Our President, the Golfer in Chief, has made the Rules of Engagement so difficult that our troops are often killed before they can even get permission to fight. Nothing has been done to stop our troops from being murdered by the Afghanis they are training, either. Now, the President wants the US to sign on to the UN”s International Criminal Court (ICC), which would allow the UN’s ICC to arrest and try US troops for War Crimes, without the legal protections guaranteed under US Law, and from which there is no appeal.

This President, with Democratic control of the Senate, has nearly all the power. If the Non-Establishment Republicans, and Conservatives, can take back the Senate in 2014, our troops can once again be protected from unnecessary danger. Please consider this, and send it on to your mailing lists.

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE:

Interestingly enough, when GWB was president you heard about military deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan almost daily. Since Obama has been in the White House, the mainstream media has beenstrangely quiet. More than 1,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in the last 27 months. This is more than the combined total of the nine years before. Thirty have died in August. During the last month, over 50 additional NATO and US servicemen have been murdered, inside jobs by those who are hired to be a force for good in Afghanistan.

This commander in chief is AWOL. Not a peep, although he ordered the White House flag flown at half-staff for the Sikhs that were killed. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military against the indifferent incompetence of this president. It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 4 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed,campaigned, fund raised, and generally ignored the plight of our men and women in uniform. But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the vote drive against this president.

Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired, and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November election if they all respond.

The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they all show up at the polls. It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turn out to vote by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

A movement has been started by many who serve in our armed forces to get out the vote in 2014. They are organizing themselves, but this can be done by all of us.   The 2014 United States elections will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2014.

During this midterm election year, all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives, and 33 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate will be contested in this election. 

PLEASE GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!

 

Blog: UN attempted end run around US Constitution

See on Scoop.itEconomicFactors

In mid-2012, the World Congress on Justice, Governance and Law for Environmental Sustainability (WCJGLES) was held in Brazil. The goal of the congress was to

“contribute to the support of Chief Justices, Attorneys General, Auditors Generals and other legal experts to the achievement of sustainable development and to provide inputs to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio +20.” continued…

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/06/un_attempted_end_run_around_us_constitution.html#ixzz2XR8i5kqP
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Bill McKee‘s insight:

Authoritarian regimes- members of the farcical United Nations-  are intent upon imposing their authoritarian views on America.  Here is a recent example of that effort.  The last thing Globalists want is for America to remain free from their clutches and want desparately to bring America down so that they can plunder at will.

See on www.americanthinker.com

Public Officials Must Learn About Agenda 21

Elected officials must learn what Agenda 21 is before opening their
mouths and revealing their ignorance. Henry Lamb explains why.

Public Officials Must Learn About Agenda 21

      Henry Lamb

California Representative Wally Herger offered an article on Agenda 21
which, unfortunately, reflects  a lack of knowledge about Agenda 21 –
shared by far too many elected officials.   In the first instance, he
said that Agenda 21 is a document developed at a U.N. Conference in
1993.

Wrong!

Agenda 21 was developed over a period of time, traceable from the
1972 U.N. Conference on the Environment, which identified “environmental
protection” as the world’s greatest problem, and gave the world the
U.N. Environmental Programme,  followed almost immediately by Nixon’s
Executive Order that created the EPA.

Then came the 1976 U.N. Conference on Human Settlements, signed by the U.S., which proclaimed that “Public control of land use is…indispensible.” 
The next major step was the creation of the U.N. World Commission on
Environment and Development in 1983, chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. 
The commission issued its final report in 1987, called Our Common Future
This document produced the concept and defined the term “Sustainable
Development” to be:  “Development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs.”

This rather ambiguous definition was spelled out in great detail in a
40-chapter, 300-page document titled Agenda 21, signed and adopted by
179 nations in 1992 (not 1993) at the U.N. Conference on Environment and
Development in Rio de Janeiro.

Herger goes on to say:

“While this document was agreed to by the United Nations, the United
States is a party to the agreement only by our membership in the U.N.
For the agreement to become legally binding, it would require submission
to the U.S. Senate for ratification by the President. This has not
occurred. Again, ‘Agenda 21’ is not legally binding on the United
States.”

Wrong!

Actually, the document was adopted by 179 nations, including the
signature of George H.W. Bush.  A nation’s signature on a U.N. document
obligates the nation to do nothing in opposition to the goals of the
document, and to promote implementation of the document’s
recommendations.  Agenda 21 is not a treaty subject to Senate
ratification.  It was never intended to be a treaty.   (Bill Clinton
signed the Kyoto Protocol.  Because his signature obligated the U.S.,
George W. Bush took the unusual action to have the U.S. signature
removed from the document.) At the same conference, however, two
treaties were adopted by the U.N.: The framework Convention on Climate
Change, signed by Bush and ratified by the Senate; and the Convention on
Biological Diversity, not signed by Bush,  signed by Clinton, but not ratified by the Senate.

Nothing in Agenda 21 is legally binding on any government until a
government – at any level – adopts an Agenda 21 recommendation as a law
or ordinance, or as an Executive Order such as EO 12852 issued by
President Bill Clinton in 1993 in response to Agenda 21 recommendation
8.7:

“Governments, in cooperation, where appropriate, with international
organizations, should adopt a national strategy for sustainable
development…”

Bill Clinton’s EO created the “President’s Council on Sustainable
Development” expressly for the purpose of implementing the
recommendations in Agenda 21 throughout federal, state, and local
governments.  The EPA and other federal agencies offered challenge
grants to state and local government to promote the implementation of
the recommendations in Agenda 21.  The federal government gave more than
$5 million to the American Planning Association to produce “Growing Smart: Legislative Guidebook,”
which provides model legislation for states that, when adopted,
requires counties and cities to adopt recommendations found in Agenda
21.

Herger says further: “There are innumerable reasons to be concerned
about the United Nations, but I don’t believe the toothless “Agenda 21″
is one of them.”

Sadly, Herger’s lack of knowledge about Agenda 21 is shared by most
elected officials.  The recommendations in Agenda 21 are presented as
Smart Growth, Sustainable Communities, Greenways, and a host of similar
buzz words.    Agenda 21 is toothless until a local government
incorporates Agenda 21 recommendations into their comprehensive land use
plans.  Then the recommendations have the force of law.

A U.N. accredited non-government organization called ICLEI
(International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) exists at
the behest of the U.N.
for the purpose of helping local governments implement the
recommendations in Agenda 21.  ICLEI has contracts with more than 600
U.S. cities and counties and is working diligently to spread its gospel
even further.

Rep Herger, and all elected officials, should learn more about Agenda
21 and its effect on communities where it has been implemented.  People
in Los Angeles County are being removed
(17:35) from their own private property for non-compliance with Agenda
21 recommendations included in recently adopted building codes. People
are being forced to live where they do not want to live because of Urban
Boundary Zones, and arbitrary and, unreasonable acreage requirements
for a single dwelling.  The free videos available here
are a great place for elected officials, and everyone else, to begin
their education on Agenda 21 and sustainable development.  This same
site offers a wealth of detailed, well-documented information on Agenda
21, its source, history, and effect.

Elected officials must learn what Agenda 21 is before opening their mouths and revealing their ignorance.

 

Originally published at The Moral Liberal by Contributing Editor, Henry Lamb, who is also the author of “The Rise of Global Governance,”  Chairman of Sovereignty International, and founder of the  Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO) and Freedom21, Inc.

Did you like this article? Be sure to share it with your friends, follow us on Facebook or Twitter, and subscribe to our RSS feed to stay up to date on problems with Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development.
Articles In This Category
Related Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read Articles
Category Articles
Related Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read Articles
Next >

It’s hard to believe… but many public officials STILL don’t have a clue concerning the United Nations Agenda 21 and the stated intentions and goals. Clueless is the word that comes to mind. This article explains once again the source of tremendous efforts to use “the environment” as cover for a far more sinister effort to bring America to it’s knees via regulation, taxation, and destruction of it’s sovereign status.

The United (Socialist) Nations – Progress on Global Governance via Climate Change, Sustainable Development and Bio-Diversity | Originals

Media_httpscienceandp_tudia

Who is behind the effort to use fraudulent “Climate Science” as a tool for political consolidation and manipulation? To be direct.. Socialists.

Examine the facts for yourself. Consider the political aspirations of those who continue to push the hoax, despite clear and compelling evidence that this man made global climate change is nothing more than a giant hoax, the aim being to use it as cover for an effort to bring the world into a “one world” government with unelected “leaders” to become imperial taskmasters. Read the evidence. Test it against the best arguments brought forth by the United Nation’s “Globalist” cabal. The one common theme is the sincere and consistent use of junk science and outright deception..even in the face of overwhelming evidence. This effort to control via a massive centralized government has nothing to do with “climate science”, and everything to do with domination and and subjugation of sovereign states to the will and power of people who lust to prey on the inhabitants of the world.. especially those who wish to live free.

UN Bureaucrats Receive Pay Hike

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon believes that there is a global environmental crisis that requires looting the Western economies to the tune of trillions of dollars in coming years. But such financial plundering apparently will not be standing in the way of a quite substantial pay increase for United Nations employees.

At a time when the West is reeling from a global recession, and individuals, corporations, and even profligate governments are realizing that a measure of financial reality is no longer optional, the recent UN diktat that $76 trillion would be needed over the next two generations to be redistributed as Third World environmental welfare sounded like a bad joke. Now, the decision to enact a significant pay raise for UN bureaucrats is further proof of Ban’s poor sense of comedic timing.

Only months ago, the secretary general was saying that the UN was facing an “emergency situation” and demanding budgetary cuts. Now, members of the UN staff in New York have received a 2.2 percent increase in their pay. As reported at FoxNews.com:

Among other things, the new income hike means that the highest ranked officials at the U.N. headquarters — including members of the audience Ban harangued last March — will get a take-home, tax-free pay package of about $240,000.

The same officials last year would have earned about $235,240. That is about one-fifth higher than the gross pay of the highest level officials of the U.S. government, including federal Cabinet members, who earn a maximum of $199,700 — before deductions and taxes. But the U.S. officials still pay taxes, which reduces their pay, on federal taxes alone, by about another 21 percent.

The difference is even bigger for the next highest tier of U.N. officials, who take home about $220,000 a year, tax-free, after the new COLA hike, known in U.N.-speak as a “post adjustment.” That’s up from about $215,760 last year. Compared to the $179,700 earned by U.S. officials at the equivalent federal pay grade, the difference is about 22 percent — before the U.S. officials start paying taxes, which they must do, like all U.S. citizens.

In fact, the top brass of the U.S. government are likely to fall even further behind U.N. pay scales in the future.

The bloated, overpaid federal bureaucracy has finally found an institution that can rival and outstrip its incapacity for restraint. The tax exempt character of UN wages only makes the situation worse, of course, removing the luxurious salaries from the tax base of the nations of which such international bureaucrats are ostensibly citizens.

With an institutional history of failure to keep the peace, even as it pursues a series of agendas that are fundamentally in conflict with American national sovereignty and the rule of constitutional law, the notion that UN bureaucrats will grow even more wealthy off the funds extracted from the United States and other nations is obscene. As the Department of Labor reports that weekly claims for unemployment insurance have soared to 417,000 — the 20th week in a row when first-time claims have exceeded 400,000. As unemployment remains a crisis in the United States, and the federal and state governments watch their budgets teeter on the brink of collapse, and economic growth remains stagnant, at least the populace may rest easy knowing the denizens of the United Nations monolith have been surfeited at the taxpayers’ expense. And those same overpaid globalists will continue to dream of the ways in which they will better order the economies of the world by stripping what wealth remains within the West and scattering it over the rest of the globe.

Trackback(0)

Comments (1)add comment

Write comment
You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Pompous organization thrives on enslaving people the world over, all the time pontificating all manner of self righteous nonsense.

Maurice Strong and the Cap & Trade Crime of the Century | RedState

Maurice Strong is the environmental George Soros. Most people don’t know who Maurice Strong is. You shouldn’t be one of them.

Glen Beck discussed the Chicago Climate Exchange (where Strong is a board member) about a week ago, and I’ve been waiting for Beck to return to the “Crime Inc.” topic and bring up Strong’s name. Beck did so for a segment on Wednesday. Beck then said to his audience: “You find everything you can on this man.” The “becktips@foxnews.com” address was listed on the screen. Beck warned that the internet was in the process of being scrubbed.

First, a personal confession. I’m tired. I have a 10-month-old and a 2-year-old. Every day is a long day. My mother-in-law went into the hospital this past week. A firend of mine (in his 50s) passed away unexpectedly. I try my best every day to tell people not to kill Jews. I try my best to tell President Obama to stop spending money this nation doesn’t have. I’m tired. I’m tired that I have to defend the Constitution from the President and from Congress. I have worked all my life to tell the truth of this country’s history, and I’ve become modestly known–though penniless–for my work. This is my second RedState post this morning. I’ll try to tell the story about Maurice Strong, but it will be in more than one part. I’m tired.

SCANDAL? WHAT SCANDAL? WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT MAURICE STRONG? IT WASN’T IN THE PAPERS!
Glenn Beck connected the dots to the “crime of the century” over a week ago, and the MSM was silent. He showed the union leader here, and the union leader there, and the Soros-funded groups over there, and there’s Bill Ayers’ brother over here, and there’s Barack Obama. The press yawned.

This post by Newshounds Beck critic Aunty Em on May 2nd, “The Beck Week That Was;Beck Whines About The Media Ignoring His Expose Comparing Regulation To One World Government And Slavery,” sums up the MSM thinking:

The official transcript doesn’t mention a “Global Government” and “New World Order,” but Beck knows what dog whistle will have his audience baying at the moon when he lays out his new phony-boloney, connect-the-dots, conspiracy between Al Gore, Cap & Trade, Goldman Sachs, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and, of course, Socialist President Barack Obama. He was right in his opening, though. Not a single media outlet picked up on the story and he was left whining about it the next morning on his Radio Drama Theatre. Media Matters said other media didn’t report it, quite rightly, “Because it’s delusional and stupid, Glenn.” Simon Maloy wrote a very funny article, well worth reading for yourselves.

What Beck fails to take into account, whenever he whines about one of his exposés being ignored, is how rapacious the media is at uncovering real news. Try and stop it. However, Beck would rather have the Fourth Estate connecting the dots between non-related coincidences and natural business connections, as he does, to find a conspiracy behind every bush. The simple fact is this: Even the most passionate Obama-loving reporter would chase a real story that could bring down the Obama administration, because journalists covet Pulitzer Prizes more than administration gratitude. If there were any reality to a single one of ‘Jimmy Olsen’ Beck’s Big Scoops, a real reporter would jump on the story faster than he could jump on a chocolate éclair. No, Glenn, the deafening silence you hear is the sound of reporters ignoring nothing at all.

I let Aunty Em have it, even pointing out that she used a fake quote of Samuel Adams. While she immediately replied to someone else to correct the spelling error of a word, she wouldn’t reply to me. I said that the MSM interest doesn’t mean there’s nothing here. I solved the origin of “the Big Apple” and no newspaper in New York City would cover it, even though they daily put a teenage whore named Amy Fisher on their front pages. A guy connected the dots to the SEC and said “I THINK BERNIE MADOFF IS RUNNING A PONZI SCHEME” and the SEC did nothing. The John Edwards scandal was discovered by the National Enquirer.

You expect the MSM to tell you about Maurice Strong and to connect the dots? Who has the time or the resources to look into this? Why not just run photos of Tiger Woods’ 150th mistress?

Plus, Glenn Beck connected the dots. Strike one. Obama is the president, and he’s very powerful. Strike two. If one of the MSM picks up this story and accuses people in power, bad things could happen. If the MSM doesn’t pick it the story, who will take notice of something that isn’t reported?

Beck confessed last night that his producer cried when going over this stuff. It could be dangerous to them. Friends of Obama have been organizing a boycott of Beck’s advertisers for the past year.

“Question with boldness,” my friend.

MAURICE STRONG’S WIKIPEDIA PAGE
To find out about Maurice Strong, go to his Wikipedia page. You’ll notice at the top: “Editing of this article by new or unregistered users is currently disabled.”

A check of the page’s history shows about 30 edits on May 12th alone.

The Maurice Strong Wikipedia page intro is this:

Maurice F. Strong, PC, CC, OM, FRSC (born April 29, 1929) is a Canadian businessman. He is an entrepreneur, environmentalist, and one of the world’s leading proponents of the United Nations’s involvement in world affairs.

Born in Oak Lake, Manitoba, Strong had his start as a petroleum entrepreneur and became president of Power Corporation until 1966. In the early 1970s he was Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and then became the first Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme. He returned to Canada to become Chief Executive Officer of Petro-Canada from 1976 to 1978. He headed Ontario Hydro, one of North Americas largest power utilities, was national President and Chairman of the Extension Committee of the World Alliance of YMCAs, and headed American Water Development Incorporated.

Today Strong lives in the People’s Republic of China,[citation needed] and is President of the Council of the United Nations’s University for Peace. UPEACE is the only university in the UN system able to grant degrees at the masters and doctoral. He is an active honorary professor at Peking University and Honorary Chairman of its Environmental Foundation. He is Chairman of the Advisory Board for the Institute for Research on Security and Sustainability for Northeast Asia.[citation needed]

The short fact about Maurice Strong is that he’s a very rich man. Whether he believes the climate crap he proposes or not, it’s certain that he’ll become wealthier if governments go along with his plans. There’s a certain honesty to that. Like: “Al Gore is making $100 million off of this scam. Joe Lieberman.Lindsey Graham, what’s your excuse?”

What Maurice Strong professes top believe are things that I firmly do not believe. Maurice Strong has worked with the United Nations for a very long time and trusts it to be a leader on Cap & Trade schemes. (I believe that the United Nations is a fraud.) Maurice Strong is a socialist and believes that rich countries should share the wealth. (I don’t believe that it’s the role of any government to redistribute earned income.) Maurice Strong believes that the world is overpopulated, as Malthus predicted, and that a China one-child policy, abortions, wars, sterilization, low sperm counts and such are all good things. (I believe that my wife should have as many babies as she wants.) Maurice Strong believes in a “New World Order,” with global rules with global courts and a global currency. (See my opinions on the United Nations failed experiment when talking about anything “global.” The United States must never surrender its sovereignty.)

Maurice Strong’s views are a direct danger to the United States of America. The only “good” thing about him is that his name is now an obvious red flag to us.

MAURICE STRONG VIDEOS
Glenn Beck has asked for Maurice Strong videos. There are plenty.

I’ve cautioned everyone here before about Jesse Ventura’s conspiracy theories (such as 9-11). There is a nine-minute video, “Maurice Strong at root of Global Warming Scam,” and it’s probably the most accessible summary of the Maurice Strong story. I know it’s Jesse Ventura and Tru TV, but the opening is pasted from other videos and the interview of a Strong associate is OK.

There’s a nine-minute CBC (Canada) documentary, “Maurice Strong’s unprecedented rise to power.” It’s OK, but it doesn’t exactly ask tough questions of its subject.

Definitely check out “Lord Christopher Monckton exposes Climate Change scam and Maurice Strong.” Lord Monckton is the anti-Strong. God bless Monckton! (Also Tru TV, For what that’s worth.)

There is a lengthy, four-part “Alan Watt on Alex Jones Tv 1/4:Who is Maurice Strong?” Skip it. There’s very little here about Maurice Strong. It’s mostly Alex Jones on the usual New World Order stuff–some of which I agree with, some of which I most certainly do not agree with. The visual is just a talking head.

“THE MAURICE STRONG FILE” AT “SOLDIER FOR LIBERTY”
Good stuff:

The Maurice Strong File
Posted on May 12, 2010. Filed under: General Info | Tags: Maurice Strong |

Thank God Glenn Beck is finally catching on to this. We have been telling you about it for the better part of a year. Below is some of the info we have on Maurice Strong and you can find much more about him and others targeting our way of life on our sister site Watchdog Central, at the last link. Please tell your friends. We must stop this now, although it may be too late. The more people that know, the better our chances. Thanks.

These Include:

Maurice Strong, Agenda 21 and more from Lord Moncton
Posted on October 20, 2009.
(Monckton mentions Strong during an interview with Glenn Beck — B.P.)

Maurice Strong – The Interview
Posted on December 16, 2009
(Four videos of a Maurice Strong interview–B.P.)

This includes articles from the Canadian press:

Maurice Strong – Man Behind Agenda 21- Part 1
Posted on October 19, 2009.
(…)
The new world devised by Maurice Strong and George Soros
United Nations and its carefully managed One World Order

By Judi McLeod Monday, November 24, 2008http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6485

According to financial experts, the world, as we know it will change dramatically by the year 2012. People, who provided for their families only three years ago, will be desperately searching for food. The story of the economic meltdown of 2008 begins and ends with the United Nations and its carefully managed One World Order. Behind the curtain of this dark chapter in human misery are ogres Maurice Strong and George Soros.

This was written back in October 2009. RedState’s Cold Warrior added some comments:

My Epiphany – It all boils down to this!
Posted on October 20, 2009
As I assembled the Maurice Strong Database, all of a sudden I understood.

I am not a researcher, I am not a journalist, I have a full time job away from here. I am just a citizen, like you. None the less, I think I have it figured out.

Everything that is wrong with this country – all of it boils down to the United Nations and Agenda 21 but more importantly, it boils down to one man – Maurice Strong
(…)
Cap and trade
*Strong in an interview at WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – WASHINGTON, D.C. on APRIL 4, 2001 was asked about biodiversity and smart growth helping with energy issues: Absolutely and also paradox, we are going to see higher energy prices, and higher energy prices will provide a very strong incentive for people to use energy more efficiently [JV: like giving a dog a bone]. Not that one should advocate high prices, but high prices are not all bad, they will permit people, and even [encourage] people to use energy more efficiently.

http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/27/maurice-strong/

*Why am I not surprised to see his name involved with cap-and-trade? Let’s see, he was involved in Oil for Food, and cash funneled via U.N. agencies to North Korea, and under Kofi Annan received a million dollar check bankrolled by Saddam Hussein’s U.N.-sanctioned regime that was delivered by Tongsun Park—Maurice Strong embodies all that is sinister and shady.

Today he is involved in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), the only firm in the U.S. that trades carbon credits, no doubt because he cares about the environment.

This reveals the plots for 2012:

Maurice Strong- Man Behind Agenda 21 – Part 2
Posted on October 20, 2009
(…)
The biggest threat to the sovereignty of the United States has to be United Nations Agenda 21. Its tentacles are so interwoven into our lives it is like an aggressive cancer.

This cancer, Agenda 21, also known as Local Agenda 21 or LA-21, is nothing short of an attack on this country. It came to life in 1992 and is spreading across the globe with the help of anyone who happens to buy into the idea of a global threat. Its real purpose is hidden inside a cloaked presentation of environmental sustainability, however, it is about control of your life, your children’s lives, their children’s lives and on into perpetuity.

Maurice Strong is an admitted socialist. His sister was a Marxist. He thinks you and yours have eaten too much, used too much and now must pay. Of course like every elite socialist, that just means you, not him, or his fellow elitist.

Youth must be indoctrinated, of course. Strong has the Earth Scouts:

Maurice Strong and the Indoctrination of Our Youth
Posted on December 16, 2009.

Soldier for Liberty also tells us that Maurice Strong has his hands in our healthcare information as well:

Soldier for Liberty Exclusive: “Roger” This? Maurice Strong connection to Future of US Healthcare
Posted on October 26, 2009
(…)
Introducing “Roger”

http://www.prevmedicine.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=60

“Roger” is Preventive Medicine’s innovative and proprietary health and lifestyle behavioral change model for the health insurance sector. Information on their website says it was “created by physicians, psychologists, IT gurus, health and lifestyle experts, and e-learning wizards. It boasts it meets people where they are in their everyday lives and engages members through fun, visual and 3-D e-learning modalities to improve optimal health, wellbeing and your bottom line…

“Roger” accomplishes it’s wellness goals by applying a browser based preventive care and lifesyle management approach that concentrates on daily personal encouragement, community support, and goal achievement indicators.”
(…)
What’s the icing on top of the cake? Guess who’s on the board of directors for wonderful new friend “Roger”?

Maurice Strong

Oh, and by the way.. not that this necessarily means anything, the company is located in the same building as The National Institute of Health in Bethesda, MD.

SUMMARY
This must be stopped. Maurice Strong’s plans are not in America’s interest. Cap & Trade has now been renamed “The American Power Act.” If passed, America will lose its power.

“Soldier for Liberty” has done yeoman work on Maurice Strong. Glenn Beck should present all of it to his wider audience.

SHORTER SUMMARY
I’m tired. Maybe more later.

Maurice Strong- It’s hilarious to watch the ‘net be scrubbed… The last thing the folks who think like him want is for ordinary people to learn what this fellow’s been up to the past couple of decades.. and who he associates with.

But people who read this blog have been on this scent trail for years.. and more people are learning why they should connect the dots.. to fight back against the dreadful plans these people have for people like us.. people who embrace freedom and the American Way of life and liberty.

Attack of the NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations)

One rarely hears of it. Few elected officials raise an eyebrow. The media makes no mention of it. But power is slowly slipping away from our elected representatives. In much the same way Mao Tse-tung had his Red Guards, so the UN has its NGOs They may well be your masters of tomorrow, and you don’t even know who or what they are. 

There are, in fact, two parallel, complimentary forces operating in the world, working together to advance the global Sustainable Development agenda, ultimately heading toward UN global governance. Those two forces are the UN itself and non-governmental organizations (NGOs.)

Beginning with the United Nations, the infrastructure pushing the Sustainable Development agenda is a vast, international matrix. At the top of the heap is the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). Created in 1973 by the UN General Assembly, the UNEP is the catalyst through which the global environmental agenda is implemented. Virtually all of the international environmental programs and policy changes that have occurred globally in the past three decades are the result of UNEP efforts.

But the UNEP doesn’t operate on its own. Influencing it and helping to write policy are thousands of non- governmental organizations (NGOs). These are private groups which seek to implement a specific political agenda. Through the UN infrastructure, particularly through the UNEP, they have great power.

The phrase “non-governmental organization” came into use with the establishment of the United Nations Organization in 1945 with provisions in Article 71 of Chapter 10 of the United Nations Charter. The term describes a consultative role for organizations that are neither government nor member states of the UN.

NGOs are not just any private group hoping to influence policy. True NGOs are officially sanctioned by the United Nations. Such status was created by UN Resolution #1296 in 1948, giving NGOs official “Consultative” status to the UN. That means they can not only sit in on international meetings, but can actively participate in creating policy, right along side government representatives.

There are numerous classifications of NGO’s. The two most common are “Operational” and “Advocacy.”

Operational NGOs are involved with designing and implementing specific projects such as feeding the hungry or organizing relief projects. These groups can be religious or secular. They can be community-based, national or international. The International Red Cross falls under the category of an operational NGO.

Advocacy NGOs are promoting a specific political agenda. They lobby government bodies, use the news media and organize activist-oriented events, all designed to raise awareness and apply pressure to promote their causes which include environmental issues, human rights, poverty, education, children, drinking water, and population control – to name a few.

Amnesty International is the largest human rights advocacy NGO in the world. Organized globally, it has more than 1.8 million members, supporters and subscribers in over 150 countries.

Today these NGOs have power nearly equal to member nations when it comes to writing U.N. policy. Just as civil service bureaucrats provide the infrastructure for government operation, so to do NGOs provide such infrastructure for the U.N. In fact, most U.N. policy is first debated and then written by the NGOs and presented to national government officials at international meetings for approval and ratification. It is through this process that the individual political agendas of the NGO groups enter the international political arena.

The policies sometimes come in the form of international treaties or simply as policy guidelines. Once the documents are presented to and accepted by representatives of member states and world leaders, obscure political agendas of private organizations suddenly become international policy, and are then adopted as national and local laws by U.N. member states. Through this very system, Sustainable Development has grown from a collection of ideas and wish lists of a wide variety of private organizations to become the most widely implemented tool in the U.N.’s quest for global governance.

Who are the NGOs?

The three most powerful organizations influencing UNEP policy are three international NGOs. They are the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the International Union for Conservation and Nature (IUCN). These three groups provide the philosophy, objectives and methodology for the international environmental agenda through a series of official reports and studies such as: World Conservation Strategy, published in 1980 by all three groups; Global Biodiversity Strategy, published in 1992; and Global Biodiversity Assessment, published in 1996.

These groups not only influence UNEP’s agenda, they also influence a staggering array of international and national NGOs around the world. Jay Hair, former head of the National Wildlife Federation, one of the U.S.’s largest environmental organizations, was also the president of the IUCN. Hair later turned up as co-chairman of the Presidents Council on Sustainable Development.

The WWF maintains a network of national chapters around the world, which influence, if not dominate, NGO activities at the national level. It is at the national level where NGOs agitate and lobby national governments to implement the policies that the IUCN, WWF and WRI get written into the documents that are advanced by the UNEP. In this manner, the world grows ever closer to global governance.

Other than treaties, how does UNEP policy become U.S. policy? Specifically, the IUCN has an incredible mix of U.S. government agencies along with major U.S. NGOs as members. Federal agencies include the Department of State, Department of Interior, Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Park Service (NPS) the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Fish and Wildlife service. These agencies send representatives to all meetings of the UNEP.

Also attending those meetings as active members are NGO representatives. These include activist groups such as the Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, National Wildlife Federation, Zero Population growth, Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club, the National Education Association, and hundreds more. These groups all have specific political agendas they desire to become law. Through their official contact with government agencies working side-by-side with the UNEP, their political wish lists become official government policy.

How the NGO wish list becomes law how can this be, you ask? How can private organizations control policy and share equal power to elected officials? Here’s how it works.

When the dust settled over the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, five major documents were forced into international policy that will change forever how national policy is made. More importantly, the Rio Summit produced the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). UNCED outlined a new procedure for shaping policy. The procedure has no name, nor is it dictatorial. It is perhaps best described as “controlled consensus” or “affirmative acquiescence.”

Put in simple street language, the procedure really amounts to a collection of NGOs, bureaucrats and government officials, all working together toward a predetermined outcome. They have met together in meetings, written policy statements based on international agreements, which they helped to create and now they are about to impose laws and regulations that will have dire effects on people’s lives and national economies. Yet, with barely a twinge of conscience they move forward with the policy, saying nothing. No one objects. It’s understood. Everyone goes along, because this is a barbaric procedure that insures their desired outcome without the ugliness of bloodshed, or even debate. It is the procedure used to advance the radical, global environmental agenda.

The UNCED procedure utilizes four elements of power: international government (UN); national governments; non-governmental organizations, and philanthropic institutions.

The NGOs are the key to the process. They create policy ideas from their own private agendas. The policy idea is then adopted by one or more U.N. organizations for consideration at a regional conference. Each conference is preceded by an NGO forum designed specifically to bring NGO activists into the debate. There they are fully briefed on the policy and then trained to prepare papers and lobby and influence the official delegates of the conference. In this way, the NGOs control the debate and assure the policy is adopted.

The ultimate goal of the conference is to produce a “Convention,” which is a legally- drawn policy statement on specific issues. Once the “Convention” is adopted by the delegates, it is sent to the national governments for official ratification. Once that is done, the new policy becomes international law.

Then the real work begins. Compliance must be assured. Again, the NGOs come into the picture. They are responsible for pressuring Congress to write national laws in order to comply with the treaty. One trick used to assure compliance is to write into the laws the concept of third-party lawsuits.

NGOs now regularly sue the government and private citizens to force policy. Their legal fees and even damage awards are paid to them out of the government treasury. Through a coordinated process, hundreds of NGOs are at work in Congress, in every state government and in every local community, advancing some component of the global environmental agenda.

However, the United States Constitution’s Tenth Amendment bars the Federal Government from writing laws that dictate local policy. To bypass this roadblock, NGOs encourage Congress to include special grants to help states and communities to fund the new policy, should they want to “voluntarily” comply.

Should a community or state refuse to participate “voluntarily,” local chapters of the NGOs are trained to go into action. They begin to pressure city councils or county commissioners to accept the grants and implement the policy. Should they meet resistance, they begin to issue news releases telling the community their elected officials are losing millions of dollars for the community. The pressure continues until the grant is finally taken and the policy becomes local law.

Americans must begin to understand that the debate over environmental issues have very little to do with clean water and air and much more to do with the establishment of power. NGOs are gaining it, locally elected officials are losing it, as the structure of American government changes to accommodate the private agendas of NGOs.

Attention All Sheep.. You are being sheared, and soon to be slaughtered should you resist.

Agenda 21 for lower living standards- United Nations World Government

Even sensible democrats are shocked at the UN effort to destroy America. What does it take to take out the politicians that push “sustainability”.. another version of the “Green Movement”. The UN is determined to impose communism on the USA.

Your taxes are being used against used to promote this agenda.