Portland State University.. deemed to require radical new “Urban Redevlopment District”? Urban Renewal is a favorite Crony Government Public/Private partnership system… A real favorite with the Progressive crowd in Portland. What can’t make sense in the private sector, makes perfect sense when government becomes a partner and uses other people’s money to finance bizarre schemes. Click to read more. This is just another abuse of power and influence that has turned Portland into a cesspool of special interests that dine on the carcass of taxpayers held ransom by a local government that prides itself as a model for insider fueled crony capitalism.
Never give an urban renewal sucker an even break
Community Soapbox by John Williams
Clackamas commissioners’ “urban renewal” measure doubly ambiguous
|Posted at 8:42 AM|
Public Hearing Notice
Tuesday September 6th. at 6:00 PM.
About 10,000 registered voters have signed the
Citizens’ petition to require voter approval for
the formation of urban renewal districts and
our measure will be on the November ballot.
The County Commissioners are drafting
a counter measure in an attempt to fool
the Citizens of the Clackamas County
not to vote for the Citizens’ measure.
This hearing may be your only opportunity to
tell the Commissioners what you think about
them putting a counter measure on the ballot
that could overturn your right to vote on the
formation of all urban renewal districts
within Clackamas County.
Help us spread the word about this hearing.
We need as many people as possible
to come and speak against the
Commissioners on this issue!
County Commissioners’ Hearing
Tuesday September 6th at 6 PM
Commissioners’ Hearing Room – 4th floor
2051 Kaen Rd. Oregon City
You may view the county’s counter measure at
Clackamas Government- An Elitist Agenda that is deaf to citizen concerns?
The Portland-Milwaukie Intergovernmental Grant Agreement between TriMet and Clackamas CountyThe county staff and four commissioners are insisting “a deal is a deal” and the agreement cannot be broken.3 out of the four parties to the contract are Clackamas County.Clackamas CountyClackamas County Development Agency
North Clackamas Parks and Recreation DistrictThe county and agency are represented by Dan Johnson. The same guy putting on the community Urban Renewal presentations.Commissioner Ann Lininger signed the agreement for all three parties.Many question whether or not she and the board had the authority because there never was any money identified as available.Contracts are broken every day of the week.In this case the majority of the board is claiming they have no choice but to honor the agreement.However, there is no defined enforceable action or cost to withdrawing.The parties to the contract could have fun suing each other.Perhaps Dan, representing the agency could sue Dan representing the county?Perhaps TriMet would sue the county for some sort of damages? There’s a big problem there because TriMet does not have the rest of the funding secured.It would be fun to see TriMet do so but even if the county were ultimately required to pay TriMet some compensation it would be in the 10s of thousands3. Yesterday BCC Work Session.Work session audio
http://media1.co.clackamas.or.us/CCSO/MediaPopUpPlay.asp?q_sURl=mms…Commissioners and staff are discussing putting a competing Urban Renewal measure on the ballot. Obviously one that would be aimed at disrupting the citizen effort to stop the Urban Renewal funding schemes including for Milwaukie Light Rail. They talked about an option where only the voters within the UR district voting on an UR measure.This is of course ridiculous as county wide services would be taking a huge hit by the diverted millions in county funding for county services.Staff/county counsel also asked to commissioners to allow them to have (hire) outside legal counsel to review our Initiative Petition.So they are going to spend public funds to have high priced lawyers help them figure out how to obstruct the public will.At 3:35 Commissioner Bernard asked what would happen if both competing measures passed.County counsel said, “we can word it so ours trumps theirs”. Benrnard said, “so we win– group laughter — Bernard , ” we declare victory”.Their disdain for the voters is now funny.4. McLoughlin Area Plan (Urban Renewal for Milwaukie Light Rail)In pushing UR, county staff Dan Johnson has been giving community presentations misrepresenting Tax Increment Financing. His claims that UR pays for itself are of course blatant lies. One of his other whoppers is that the “Clackamas Town Center Urban Renewal District created 30,000 jobs”.The Columbia River Crossing lie about creating 25,000 lies has been shown by Willamette Week to be only 2500 jobs.The 14,000 jobs that TriMet and the commissioners like to tell about Milwaukie Light Rail is another complete fabrication.The BIG DIG in Boston spent $50 billion and it was determined to have created only 5000 jobs.The MAP UR scheme will be much larger than the MLR $25 million. Probably a $100 million or more plan. All borrowed and paid back by skimming property taxes from a likely 700 acre, or greater, UR district.It’s interesting that this Beaverton UR plan, that requires voter approval, is posted on the MAP website.See it here:http://www.mcloughlinareaplan.org/forum/map-forum/beaverton-approves-150m-1000-downtown-ur-plan-voters-now-decide-in-november-2011/Although this Beaverton plan will go to a public vote the same misinformation is being distributed.Their plan involves $150 million, 1000 acres, $777 million in assessed value and not the city or paper tells the voters that all of the normal yearly increases on ALL of the 1000 acres will be diverted from essential services to pay the UR debt. This will trigger the need for new taxes and fees and/or service cuts to deal with the resulting funding gap.Yet city officials and the press are telling the voters,“The unanimous approval puts the $150 million, 30-year plan – which will not increase residents’ taxes – in the hands of city voters, who will decide the measure’s fate in the Nov. 8 election.The city’s urban renewal district encompasses nearly 1,000 acres and around $777 million in assessed property tax value in and around the city’s core. The area includes historic Old Town, the TriMet transit area, Central Beaverton’s office and retail area and the “employment district” east of Highway 217 between Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway and Allen Boulevard.An urban renewal district provides a funding mechanism that encourages redevelopment of a designated blighted area to increase property values.Tax increment financing effectively freezes assessed values at a certain level and pays for redevelopment projects and bond debt through the amount the value increases from that level.”They are misleading the voters by not telling them most of the increased property values and property taxes used to pay the UR debt have nothing to do with the proposed development.Those increases are normal yearly increases that happen without any UR plan.With the cost of services rising every year this dishonest diverting leaves a big funding hole.Clackamas County’s plan to borrow $25 million for Milwaukie Light Rail wil require diverting $45 million in property taxes from the general fund that would otherwise go to essential services and existing payrolls & jobs.5. Commissioner DamonAn earlier update noted Damon’s long history with MLR that disputes her claim of being a new commissioner and therefore lacking familiarity with the project.She has been more involved than any other, for years, as a facilitator persuading (I mean involving) the public.along with this Damon -video on at 45:00 mms://media1.co.clackamas.or.us/ClackVideo/CableLibrary/BCC7-14-11.wmvThis link on her history with MLR did not work “was on the Project Staff as a consultant for Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project Citizen Advisory Committee.”It had been removed by Metro. Here it is attached Damon MLRMEETING: Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project Citizen Advisory CommitteeDATE: Thursday, October 25, 2007
Crista Gardner, Phillip Kennedy-Wong, Jenn Tuerk, Mark Turpel, Bridget Wieghart, Karen Withrow TriMet Sean Batty, Claudia Steinberg, Dave Unsworth Project Consultants Jamie Damon, Jeanne Lawson & Associates PDOT Steve Iwata City of Milwaukie Kenny Asher
Urban Renewal sounds good. But when you actually investigate the enormous costs and compare that to the benefits… just who is getting the benefit? Urban Renewal is another enormous waste of money… and another rabbit hole that government sells as a “desireable” function of government. Not so.
Urban renewal’s history of failure.. just a few..
Urban renewal is the use of public funds to test extremely expensive and historically failed efforts to enforce conformity to the social viewpoint of elitist urban social planners. Only the public sector would waste money on this scale, over and over and over.. trying to create a narrow version of “heaven on earth” by the politically correct social engineering elite.
Urban Renewal is one of the most expensive and failed programs in government Governments are filled with “planners” who plead for “do overs”.. insisting the next time, they’ll get it right.